Laura Loomer and Alex Jones Criticize Amy Coney Barrett for Siding with Liberal Justices on Trump’s Contractor Payments







In a recent legal decision that sent shockwaves through the conservative political landscape, Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett ruled alongside liberal justices in a case concerning  President Donald Trump’s obligations to pay contractors. This ruling drew fierce criticism from right-wing commentators, particularly Laura Loomer and Alex Jones, both of whom have built their reputations on hardline conservative and nationalist positions. Their critiques underscore broader concerns about Barrett’s judicial philosophy and the ongoing tension between Trump’s allies and members of the judiciary.

Background of the Case

The case in question involved a series of legal disputes over payments to contractors who had worked on Trump Organization projects. Several contractors and subcontractors had sued for nonpayment, claiming that they had fulfilled their contractual obligations but had not received due compensation. The dispute eventually reached the Supreme Court, where the justices were asked to rule on the enforceability of the contractual agreements and Trump’s financial responsibility in these matters.

Despite expectations that Barrett, a Trump-appointed justice, would align with the conservative bloc, she instead joined the court’s liberal justices in a ruling that upheld the lower courts’ decisions requiring payment to the contractors. The ruling was framed in terms of contract law, ensuring that business agreements would be enforced regardless of the political affiliations of the parties involved.

Laura Loomer’s Reaction

Laura Loomer, a far-right activist and media personality known for her unwavering support of Trump, wasted no time in condemning Barrett’s decision. Taking to social media, Loomer accused Barrett of betraying the America First movement and falling in line with what she described as “globalist” influences within the judiciary.

Loomer’s criticisms focused on what she perceived as Barrett’s failure to protect Trump from what she claimed was a politically motivated legal attack. She argued that the ruling played into the hands of Trump’s political adversaries, who have long sought to portray him as unethical in his business dealings. In Loomer’s view, Barrett’s decision was emblematic of a larger issue within the judiciary, where even Trump-appointed justices have failed to uphold the principles he campaigned on.

Beyond the specific case, Loomer suggested that Barrett’s ruling indicated a broader pattern of judicial unreliability among supposed conservative justices. She pointed to other instances where Trump appointees have ruled in ways that defied expectations, warning her followers that conservative activists must be more discerning in their support for judicial nominees.

Alex Jones Joins the Attack

Alex Jones, the controversial founder of Infowars, also weighed in on the ruling, amplifying Loomer’s criticisms and adding his own conspiratorial spin. Jones framed Barrett’s decision as part of a larger deep-state effort to undermine Trump’s legacy, asserting that the judiciary had been compromised by globalist elites seeking to destroy nationalist movements worldwide.

During multiple segments on his Infowars program, Jones painted Barrett as a Trojan horse within the Supreme Court, arguing that her decision demonstrated a lack of loyalty to the conservative cause. He accused Barrett of having been “flipped” by the establishment, claiming that her siding with liberal justices was evidence of outside pressures influencing her decision-making.

Jones also expanded on broader themes of judicial corruption, tying Barrett’s ruling to what he sees as a systemic effort to suppress conservative leaders through legal means. He warned his audience that similar tactics could be used against other populist leaders, urging his followers to remain vigilant and politically active.

Implications for Barrett and the Conservative Movement

The backlash from Loomer and Jones reflects deeper tensions within the conservative movement, particularly regarding Trump-appointed judges who have not ruled consistently in ways that align with Trump’s personal or political interests. Barrett, who was widely celebrated by conservatives upon her nomination, has faced increasing scrutiny from the right, with some questioning her reliability as a conservative justice.

This case also highlights the ongoing friction between Trump and the broader judicial system. While Trump’s supporters expect unwavering loyalty from his appointees, justices like Barrett operate within a legal framework that does not always align with political expectations. This reality has led to growing disillusionment among Trump’s most ardent backers, who view judicial independence as an obstacle to their political objectives.

Additionally, the criticisms from Loomer and Jones serve as a reminder of the influence that media figures wield over conservative discourse. Their ability to shape narratives and mobilize public opinion means that even Supreme Court justices are not immune from political pressure. Barrett’s ruling may have been based on legal principles, but its political ramifications are undeniable.

Alex Jones and Laura Loomer  and Jesse Lee Peterson said this about Amy Barrett and her adopted children.

 

  • On X, Trump ally Laura Loomer posted a photo of Barrett’s family and wrote: “Amy Coney Barrett was a DEI appointee.” Barrett’s family, which includes two Black children who were adopted from Haiti, were featured prominently during her Senate confirmation hearing in 2020. [Twitter/X, 3/5/25; NPR, 9/14/24; NBC News, 10/16/20]
  • Alex Jones suggested that Barrett had been compromised because of “all those weak kids you’d adopted around the world.” Jones claimed that “people got some calls over at the old Supreme Court, ‘Hey, we got a little dirt on you, Amy Coney Barrett, all those weak kids you'd adopted around the world.’” [Infowars, The Alex Jones Show, 3/6/25]
  • Right-wing pundit Jesse Lee Peterson, who has a history of misogynistic rhetoric, posted: “A weeping female is a destructive female. … Amy Barrett ‘wept’ with her black kids after George Floyd expired.” [Twitter/X, 3/7/25; Media Matters, 11/4/24]
  • This just goes to show that unless you obey Trump and be apart of his cheer leading squad you will pay the price of being slandered on the world's stage!

Conclusion

The uproar over Amy Coney Barrett’s decision in the Trump contractor case illustrates the challenges faced by conservative justices navigating a highly polarized political landscape. While Barrett’s ruling adhered to established legal norms, it has been interpreted by figures like Laura Loomer and Alex Jones as a betrayal of the conservative movement.

This controversy underscores the broader struggle within the Republican Party and the conservative movement over the role of the judiciary. As Trump’s allies continue to push for more ideologically rigid justices, cases like this serve as flashpoints for debates over loyalty, principle, and the balance between law and politics. Whether Barrett’s decision will have lasting political consequences remains to be seen, but for now, it has reignited the ever-present tensions between the judiciary and the populist right.

Sources:

https://www.mediamatters.org/supreme-court/dei-judge-right-wing-media-personalities-attack-amy-coney-barrett-order-requiring

https://www.politico.com/newsletters/playbook/2025/03/08/maga-turns-on-acb-00219772



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

10 Reasons why Trump is the worst President the United States has ever had!!!

Image
Donald Trump's presidency has been a subject of intense debate and scrutiny. While some praise his unorthodox approach, a comprehensive analysis reveals several aspects of his leadership that have led scholars, historians, and political analysts to rank him among the least effective presidents in American history. This blog delves into the key reasons underpinning this assessment. 1. Assault on Democratic Institutions and the Rule of Law Trump's tenure was marked by actions that many perceived as direct challenges to the foundational principles of American democracy. He frequently undermined the judiciary, intelligence agencies, and the free press—pillars essential for a functioning democracy. His administration's defiance of congressional subpoenas and the dismissal of officials who opposed him raised alarms about the erosion of checks and balances. Such actions led to concerns about potential autocratic tendencies, with some experts drawing parallels to classic authorit...
Read more

Black female Arby's worker defends herself against racist white male customer and gets fired for it!!!

Image
In January 2025, Kendra Irvin, an employee at an Arby's restaurant in Memphis, Tennessee, faced a distressing encounter with a customer who became irate over his order. The incident began when the customer, dissatisfied with his roast beef sandwich, accused the staff of making his order incorrectly. Despite Irvin's attempts to resolve the issue by offering to remake the sandwich, the situation escalated. The customer began cursing, threw items at Irvin, and eventually leaped over the counter, hurling racial slurs. In response, Irvin armed herself with a butcher knife and a fry basket to defend against the customer's aggression. The altercation ended when the customer threw objects at the staff before fleeing the scene.  Following this incident, Irvin was terminated from her position at Arby's for allegedly violating company policy by defending herself. She expressed confusion over her dismissal, questioning what else she could have done in such a threatening...
Read more

Canada Declares when the smoke clears; Canada will be the winner in this Trade war with the United States!!!

Image
  For decades, Canada and the United States have shared one of the largest and most complex trade relationships in the world. However, economic tensions have occasionally escalated into trade disputes, with tariffs, counter-tariffs, and negotiations dominating the political and economic landscapes of both nations. Recently, Canada has made bold claims that it will emerge victorious in the ongoing trade war with the U.S. While this assertion may seem ambitious, a closer look at Canada’s economic strategies, trade alliances, and resilience suggests that it has a strong case for success. Canada's Economy  One of Canada’s key strengths in this trade battle is its diversified economy. Unlike past trade disputes that left Canada heavily reliant on the U.S. for exports, recent initiatives have broadened its trade partnerships. Canada has expanded trade agreements with the European Union through the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and has deepened ties with Pacific...
Read more